At 12:53 PM 6/13/03 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: > > Right, this could work (even though in 2.3, the module type is no > > longer subclassable). > >Oh, no! Why not? There'd better be a REALLY good reason >for this, because you've just killed one of the ideas >I was looking forward to trying out. Don't panic. It's still subclassable as of 2.3b1. It's *modules* that you can't subclass.