PEP 318 (was Re: [Python-Dev] Re: Guido's Magic Code was:
inlinesort option)
Guido van Rossum
guido at python.org
Tue Nov 4 10:55:32 EST 2003
> Hmmm -- why is:
>
> class Foo:
> __metaclass__ = MetaFoo
> ...
>
> "ok", compared to e.g.:
>
> class Foo is MetaFoo:
> ...
>
> while, again for example,
>
> def foo():
> ...
> foo = staticmethod(foo)
>
> is presumably deemed "not ok" compared to e.g.:
>
> def foo() is staticmethod:
> ...
>
> ???
>
> Both cases of current syntax do the job (perhaps not elegantly but
> they do) and in both cases a new syntax would increase elegance.
Perhaps (I haven't really thought this through) because you can place
the __metaclass__ thing right at the top of the class definition,
while the staticmethod thing must necessarily come after the entire
method definition. Also I expect that __metaclass__ usage is rather
more rare than static or class methods are. And often one introduces
a metaclass by inheriting from a base class whose sole (or main)
purpose is to change the metaclass -- just like inheriting from object.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list