Just van Rossum
just at letterror.com
Tue Oct 14 04:37:33 EDT 2003
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> After reading this exchange, I'm not sure I agree with Tim about the
> importance of avoiding to compare the full records. Certainly the
> *cost* of that comparison doesn't bother me: I expect it's usually
> going to be a tuple or list of simple types like ints and strings, and
> comparing those is pretty efficient.
I have no opinion about the importance, but I do have a use case that
differs from Tim's.
The other week I found myself sorting a list of dictionary keys by an
arbitrary attribute of the dict values. The sort needed to be stable, in
the sense that for attributes that contained equal values, the previous
sort order was to be maintained. The dict values themselves weren't
meaningfully sortable. What I did (had to do, given the requirements) is
almost exactly what Tim proposes (I included the indices in the sort),
so having that functionality built into list.sort() would have been
helpful for me. Not having that functionality would mean I'd either not
use the decorator sort feature (ie. do what I do now) or go through
hoops and make the decorator generate the indices. The latter approach
doesn't sound very appealing to me.
More information about the Python-Dev