[Python-Dev] accumulator display syntax
Phillip J. Eby
pje at telecommunity.com
Fri Oct 17 11:54:49 EDT 2003
At 07:41 AM 10/17/03 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>I'd just like to pipe into this discussion saying that while Peter
>Norvig's pre-PEP is neat, I'd reject it if it were a PEP; the main
>reason that the proposed notation doesn't return a list. I agree that
>having generator comprehensions would be a more general solution. I
>don't have a proposal for generator comprehension syntax though, and
>[yield ...] has the same problem.
(yield x*2 for x in foo)
or maybe:
(yield: x*2 for x in foo)
would "yield" better visibility that this is a value that *does* something
(like lambda). Or perhaps without the parentheses, but I think they're
better for clarity, and I'd add them in practice even if they weren't required.
The main problem with a gencomp syntax is that some people are going to use
it for everything whether they need it or not, even when they have a small
list and the frame overhead for the generator is going to make it
slower. So it almost wants to be a really awkward ugly thing in order to
discourage them... but then again, that way lies Ruby. :)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list