[Python-Dev] SRE recursion removed
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Sun Oct 19 14:40:16 EDT 2003
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Gustavo Niemeyer <niemeyer at conectiva.com> writes:
>>
>> I'm shocked. Do you really belive that I've done all the changes and
>> past fixes in SRE without knowing how it works? I thought my
>> credibility was a little higher.
>
> I was relying on your credibility, so I was surprised that you are
> interested to leave the old code in - that suggests that you feel
> there are problems with your code. I'm trying to find out what you
> think these problems are.
>
> However, getting all trust in the SRE code from the trust that I have
> in you is not enough for me - and, PLEASE UNDERSTAND, this has nothing
> to do with you personally. I feel bad if important code is so
> unmaintainable that only a single person understands it. I made the
> remark as a comment to you saying
>
> "let's please wait a little bit to see the new code working?"
>
> which suggested that we actually have to *see* how the code works, in
> order to determine whether it works.
As a datapoint, it sounded to me more like Gustavo saying, "I'm pretty
sure I know what I'm doing here, but this is hairy code and I'd like to
keep the old code around for a bit as a cross-check in case it turns out
I'm wrong." But if Gustavo's code already passes the regex regression
suite, I would say it's just him being suspenders-and-belt -- which in my
book as a tech support-type person is a Good Thing.
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
--Bill Harlan
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list