[Python-Dev] Re: RELEASED Python 2.3.1

Tim Peters tim.one at comcast.net
Fri Sep 26 14:24:27 EDT 2003


[Jeremy Hylton]
>> We should treat 2.3.1 like 2.3.1rc1 and aim for Sep. 30 for a 2.3.2.

[Anthony Baxter]
> Wouldn't it be better to cut a 2.3.2rc before the final 2.3.2?
>
> once-bitten-ly,

Well, Jeremy's "Sep. 30" is only 4 days away.  If 2.3.2 is restricted to
fixing just the obvious big problems already reported against 2.3.1, in
reality it's like Jeremy said:  2.3.1 was really 2.3.2c1 <0.5 wink>.

Don't get too gun-shy.  There were lots of changes in who did what for the
2.3.1 release, and some glitches were inevitable.  It *had* gotten so smooth
with the same people doing the same things all the time that, e.g., you must
have noticed that Guido stopped doing anything for releases.  I would have
liked to pay a lot more attention but just couldn't make time for it; I'm
sure the same is true of the other PythonLabs alumni (including Guido).  So
some things could have gone better.  It's not that big a deal -- next time
they will go better.  Remember that we pioneered all possible ways to screw
up a release already, and discovered that it's a finite set <wink>.




More information about the Python-Dev mailing list