[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)

[Heiko Wundram]

Am Samstag, 7. August 2004 06:55 schrieb Kevin J. Butler:
> The following makes sense to me, uses previously invalid syntax, and
> uses the '.' punctuation in a way similar to existing/proposed usage:
>
>        def longMethodNameForEffect(longArgumentOne=None,
>                                    longArgumentTwo=42):
>            .staticmethod
>            .funcattrs(grammar="'@' dotted_name [ '(' [arglist] ')' ]",
>                       status="experimental", author="BDFL")
>            """
>            asdfasdf
>            """
>            raise NotYetImplemented

-1

Same objection from me as to the proposal of decorating with | in the 
function: it simply takes away the actual meaning from the decorator (which 
actually is to make it very clear to see that the function is special in some 
way).

Heiko.