[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
Chris King
colanderman at gmail.com
Sat Aug 7 20:07:35 CEST 2004
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:53:28 -0700, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> > Same here -- I'd rather see .foo at function level (i.e. not nested in
> > a with block) provide true function attributes, not decorators.
>
> Bleah on that idea. The body of the function should express what it
> does when it is called. Function attributes are for who calls it
> (roughly).
I'd still rather see .foo kept free for that purpose (in that
context), in case we can convince you of the merits of function
attributes sometime in the future ;)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list