[Python-Dev] Decorator order implemented backwards?

Moore, Paul Paul.Moore at atosorigin.com
Tue Aug 10 10:21:06 CEST 2004


From: James Y Knight
> So, um...I assume this is a bug in the implementation,
> not the PEP, because the PEP's way makes sense and the
> way it's implemented doesn't.

Interestingly, I found the PEP's description felt "backwards"
to me, but didn't mention it because I didn't want to start
another long discussion over something which has proved to
be subjective in past discussions. I'd vote for correcting
the PEP rather than the code (not least because it's probably
easier :-))

But consistency is the only real requirement here.

Paul.


__________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended 
solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this 
e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it.
As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group 
liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the 
sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender 
does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be 
liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted.
__________________________________________________________________________


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list