[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't

[James Y Knight]

On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> No, no, no!  The "new" convention for built-in type names is all
> lowercase.  CamelCaseType is old and only used in the context of
> types.py.

Sooo should (for 'generator' in objects that claim to be in 
__builtins__ but aren't),
1) 'generator' be added to __builtins__
2) 'generator' be added to types.py and its __module__ be set to 'types'
3) 'generator' be added to <newmodule>.py and its __module__ be set to 
'<newmodule>' (and a name for the module chosen)

James