[Python-Dev] Update PEP 292
Brett C.
bac at OCF.Berkeley.EDU
Mon Aug 23 21:04:19 CEST 2004
Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 22:10, Brett C. wrote:
>
>
>>Don't let the photos from PyCON fool you; I never have a good look on my
>>face and I tend to look stoned.
>
>
> Just "look"? Dang, I really thought Tim, Fred, and I had a new recruit
> for our CrackPython project. The first one's free, y'know.
>
Ooh. Tempting. But then I would have to give up my Opium addiction to
go back and I don't know if I can do that. That communal feel of
hanging out in the local Opium den at my cousin's place would be such a
loss. =)
>
>>Basically I can live with having a single string module, but I would
>>like to see some real deprecation happen. The nice thing about the
>>pacakge separation is it made it clear in the code what would be going
>>away. If we at least at PendingDeprecation to what is supposed to be
>>taken out I will be happy.
>
>
> At the very least, my rewrite of libstring.tex will make it clear which
> inhabitants of the string module are going to be deprecated. Besides,
> since it's clear that Python 3000 will take a broader look at standard
> library packagization, I'll drop this if we can agree that the PEP 292
> classes should go in the existing string module.
>
OK, that works for me.
-Brett
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list