[Python-Dev] Re: new syntax for wrapping (PEP 318)
Ronald Oussoren
oussoren at cistron.nl
Thu Feb 26 14:28:42 EST 2004
On 26-feb-04, at 3:56, Josiah Carlson wrote:
>> Just a data point from a user: I use classmethod fairly frequently,
>> and
>> I would *love* to see some syntax to support it. As has been pointed
>> out before, classmethod (and staticmethod) are a part of the interface
>> of a function, and shouldn't be tacked on to the end of the body.
>> Please let me put them where people (and hopefully pydoc and
>> pychecker)
>> can easily see them.
>
> I personally don't see the point of using any syntax for wrapping a
> function like so:
>
> class a:
> def funct(self):
> pass
> a = classmethod(a)
Not that I have anything usefull to add, but ...
I find the proposed syntax easier to understand than the current
alternative, even for short functions.
In "def foo(self) [classmethod]: pass" the [classmethod] part feels
like an anotation/declaration, while "foo = classmethod(foo)" has a
more magical feel.
I'd expect at least as much newbe questions about the current idiom
than about the alternatives.
Ronald
--
X|support bv http://www.xsupport.nl/
T: +31 610271479 F: +31 204416173
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list