[Python-Dev] PEP 326 (quick location possibility)
python at rcn.com
Thu Jan 29 17:32:55 EST 2004
> [Thomas Heller]
> > Well, then we should add "==" and "<>" also.
> Alas, <> will be introduced as a deprecated spelling, despite Barry's
> > I'm sure disambiguities in the grammar can be resolved somehow ;-)
> > >>> == == ==
> > True
> > >>> <> <> <>
> > False
> I'm quite sure the last line should be True. <> compares not equal to
> everything, including itself, while == compares equal to everything.
> >>> <> == ==
> might be a nice way to spell random.choice([True, False]); or maybe it
> should raise a new ParadoxError. We should leave *something* for
> decide here <wink>.
I suspect Jeremy will want a write-up about whether
there should be early or late evaluation:
>>> == == ==
<undecided_bool instance at 0x00A3BF08>
More information about the Python-Dev