[Python-Dev] RE: test_sort.py failure
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Thu Jul 29 08:05:44 CEST 2004
Tim Peters wrote:
> [Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)]
>
>>I guess it would depend on how consistently it could be provoked.
>
> That's the rub -- it depends on whether the system realloc() manages
> (in the pre-patch code) to extend the initial empty_ob_item thingie
> in-place, and do all subsequent extends in-place too. The overall
> odds should be better the shorter the initial list (> 1), but it still
> depends on the system realloc(), and almost certainly depends too on
> the state of the C malloc heap at the time the test begins.
If a shorter list would provoke this more consistently, would there be a
benefit in having test_sort run this test twice? (Once with length 50,
once with length 3)
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | Brisbane, Australia
Email: ncoghlan at email.com | Mobile: +61 409 573 268
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list