[Python-Dev] Re-raise in absence of an "active" exception
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Jun 26 07:02:25 EDT 2004
Jeremy Hylton wrote:
> The definition of what it means for an exception to be "active" in a
> scope needs to be clarified. The language reference doesn't appear to
> define what that means, so I took a narrow reading. I think the code
> you mention later in your post is code I wrote :-).
It seems that Guido has attempted to clarify it as "an exception is
active until the next exception is raised, or the program terminates".
However, that clarification doesn't describe the current implementation,
atleast not for interactive mode:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
TypeError: exceptions must be classes, instances, or strings
(deprecated), not NoneType
Here, the re-raise doesn't find an exception anymore, even
though non has been raised...
I would prefer if it were clarified as "An exception is active
until the exception handler completes. When control runs off
the end of the exception handler, or it completes through a
return, break, or continue, no exception is active. When a new
exception is raised (or the currently active one is re-raised),
that exception becomes active."
More information about the Python-Dev