[Python-Dev] PEP 318 - generality of list;
restrictions on elements
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Mar 8 16:00:01 EST 2004
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
>
> >> I'd expect w2() to be passed whatever w1() returns, regardless of
> >> whether it's callable. It should raise an exception if it gets
> >> something it can't handle.
>
> aahz> No, that's not right. If
>
> aahz> def foo() [w1, w2]: pass
>
> aahz> is valid, this must also always be valid:
>
> aahz> def foo() [w2]: pass
>
> Can you explain why this must be the case? I agree that coupling between w1
> and w2 should be discouraged (see my ast example).
Principle of least surprise, essentially. There are already going to be
enough obscure uses for this; let's try to keep the completely whacky out
of it. You'll have to come up with an awfully convincing use case to
change my mind.
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"Do not taunt happy fun for loops. Do not change lists you are looping over."
--Remco Gerlich, comp.lang.python
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list