[Python-Dev] anonymous blocks
Shane Holloway (IEEE)
shane.holloway at ieee.org
Wed Apr 20 18:32:17 CEST 2005
Aahz wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2005, Shane Holloway (IEEE) wrote:
>>However, my opinion is that it does not read smoothly. This form
>>requires that I say what I'm doing with something before I know the
>>context of what that something is. For me, blocks are not about
>>shortening the code, but rather clarifying *intent*.
>
>
> Hmmmm.... How is this different from defining functions before they're
> called?
It's not. In a function scope I'd prefer to read top-down. When I
write classes, I tend to put the public methods at the top. Utility
methods used by those entry points are placed toward the bottom. In
this way, I read the context of what I'm doing first, and then the
details of the internal methods as I need to understand them.
Granted I could achieve this effect with::
class Before:
def readIt(self, filename):
def readIt():
withFile(filename, doReading)
def doReading(aFile):
self.readPartA(aFile)
self.readPartB(aFile)
self.readPartC(aFile)
return readIt()
Which is fine with me, but the *intent* is more obfuscated than what the
block construct offers. And I don't think my crew would appreciate if I
did this very often. ;)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list