[Python-Dev] PEP 340 - possible new name for block-statement
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Sat Apr 30 00:43:00 CEST 2005
On Fri, Apr 29, 2005, Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>
> Actually, I've just realized that I was misled by your argument into
> thinking that the possibility of confusing a multi-line call and a block of
> this sort is a problem. It's not, because template blocks can be viewed as
> multi-line calls that just happen to include a block of code as one of the
> arguments. So, mistaking one for the other when you're just skimming the
> code and not looking at things like "as" or the ":", is really not
> important.
Maybe. I'm not persuaded, but this inclines me toward agreeing with
your position.
> In the second place, the most important cue to understanding the behavior
> of a template block is the template function itself; the bare syntax gives
> it the most prominence. Blocks like 'synchronized(self):' should be
> instantly comprehensible to Java programmers, for example, and 'retry(3):'
> is also pretty self-explanatory. And so far, template function names and
> signatures have been quite brief as well.
This works IMO IFF Python is regarded as a language with user-defined
syntactical structures. Guido has historically disagreed strongly with
that philosophy; until and unless he reverses his opinion, this is
precisely why the non-keyword version will continue to receive -1 from
me. (As it happens, I agree with Guido, so if Guido wants to change,
I'll probably argue until I see good reason. ;-)
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"It's 106 miles to Chicago. We have a full tank of gas, a half-pack of
cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses." "Hit it."
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list