[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
Gareth McCaughan
gmccaughan at synaptics-uk.com
Tue Aug 23 18:38:20 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins]python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Tuesday 2005-08-23 16:51, Fredrik Lundh wrote:
> Gareth McCaughan wrote:
>
> > It's valid C99, meaning "this is an unsigned long long".
>
> since when does Python require C99 compilers?
>
> </F>
It doesn't, of course, and I hope it won't for a good while.
I was just responding to this:
| Perhaps OS X has some sort of Steve Jobs special constant suffix "ULL"
| that Mr. Gates and the ANSI C folks have yet to accept
since in fact Mr Gates and the ANSI C folks (and the gcc folks,
and probably plenty of others I can't check so easily) *have*
accepted it.
--
g
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins]python/dist/src/Modules_hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list