[Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules _hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
Terry Reedy
tjreedy at udel.edu
Tue Aug 23 23:23:50 CEST 2005
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules _hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules _hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
"Raymond Hettinger" <raymond.hettinger at verizon.net> wrote in message
news:000101c5a7f9$efb77480$8901a044 at oemcomputer...
> Except from PEP 7:
>
> "Use ANSI/ISO standard C (the 1989 version of the standard)."
Just checked (P&B, Standard C): only one L allowed, not two. But with C99
compilers becoming more common, accidental usages of C99-isms in submitted
code will likely become more common, especially when there is not a
graceful C89 alternative. While the current policy should be followed
while it remains the policy, it may need revision someday.
Terry J. Reedy
- Previous message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules _hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Next message: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Modules _hashopenssl.c, NONE, 2.1 sha256module.c, NONE, 2.1 sha512module.c, NONE, 2.1 md5module.c, 2.35, 2.36 shamodule.c, 2.22, 2.23
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list