[Python-Dev] Remove str.find in 3.0?
Michael Chermside
mcherm at mcherm.com
Mon Aug 29 21:53:08 CEST 2005
Raymond writes:
> That suggests that we need a variant of split() that has been customized
> for typical find/index use cases. Perhaps introduce a new pair of
> methods, partition() and rpartition()
+1
My only suggestion is that when you're about to make a truly
inspired suggestion like this one, that you use a new subject
header. It will make it easier for the Python-Dev summary
authors and for the people who look back in 20 years to ask
"That str.partition() function is really swiggy! It's everywhere
now, but I wonder what language had it first and who came up with
it?"
-- Michael Chermside
[PS: To explain what "swiggy" means I'd probably have to borrow
the time machine.]
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list