[Python-Dev] Requesting that a class be a new-style class
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at iinet.net.au
Sat Feb 19 06:03:27 CET 2005
This is something I've typed way too many times:
Py> class C():
File "<stdin>", line 1
class C():
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
It's the asymmetry with functions that gets to me - defining a function with no
arguments still requires parentheses in the definition statement, but defining a
class with no bases requires the parentheses to be omitted.
Which leads in to the real question: Does this *really* need to be a syntax
error? Or could it be used as an easier way to spell "class C(object):"?
Then, in Python 3K, simply drop support for omitting the parentheses from class
definitions - require inheriting from ClassicClass instead. This would also have
the benefit that the elimination of defaulting to classic classes would cause a
syntax error rather than subtle changes in behaviour.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at email.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.skystorm.net
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list