[Python-Dev] Thoughts on stdlib evolvement
Tim Lesher
tlesher at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 00:36:48 CEST 2005
On 6/6/05, Reinhold Birkenfeld <reinhold-birkenfeld-nospam at wolke7.net> wrote:
> - Flat namespace: Should we tend to a more hierarchic library (e.g.
> inet.url, inet.http, inet.nntp)? This would increase clarity when
> searching for a module.
-1. I feel the opposite way: when trying to figure out where something
"lives", I prefer Python's flat namespace to (for example) Java's
com.company.baz.bar.foo hierarchy.
> - 3rd party modules: There are many superb modules out there, some of which
> really do have a "standard" character. Examples include PIL, numarray,
> ElementTree, [wxPython - I know this is a hairy issue],
I think the most important question for each of these is "is the
module's release schedule at least as stable as Python's?". For many
of these, I suspect the answer is "no".
--
Tim Lesher <tlesher at gmail.com>
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list