[Python-Dev] Breaking off Enhanced Iterators PEP from PEP 340
Guido van Rossum
gvanrossum at gmail.com
Fri May 6 19:45:28 CEST 2005
[Steven Bethard]
> So, just to make sure, if we had another PEP that contained from PEP 340[1]:
> * Specification: the __next__() Method
> * Specification: the next() Built-in Function
> * Specification: a Change to the 'for' Loop
> * Specification: the Extended 'continue' Statement
> * the yield-expression part of Specification: Generator Exit Handling
> would that cover all the pieces you're concerned about?
>
> I'd be willing to break these off into a separate PEP if people think
> it's a good idea. I've seen very few complaints about any of these
> pieces of the proposal. If possible, I'd like to see these things
> approved now, so that the discussion could focus more directly on the
> block-statement issues.
I don't think it's necessary to separate this out into a separate PEP;
that just seems busy-work. I agree these parts are orthogonal and
uncontroversial; a counter-PEP can suffice by stating that it's not
countering those items nor repeating them.
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list