[Python-Dev] PEP 340: Deterministic Finalisation (new PEP draft, either a competitor or update to PEP 340)
Greg Ewing
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz
Tue May 10 04:45:44 CEST 2005
Ron Adam wrote:
> That's sort of why I'm against changing 'for', and for adding
> the new loop/block. I see it as a loop with a higher level of
> abstraction. A new tool to be used in new ways, but I want to keep my
> old dependable tools too.
But if there's too much overlap in functionality
between the old and the new tool, you're in danger
of losing TOOWTDI.
Random thought for the day:
Programming tools are different from physical tools.
I own quite a few different screwdrivers, several
of which would be more or less equally good for
any particular screw, and this isn't a problem.
But I don't have a big crowd of people looking
over my shoulder while I work, all trying to figure
out why I chose one particular screwdriver over
another, and decide which would be the best
screwdriver to use on their screws.
--
Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a |
Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. |
greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list