[Python-Dev] PEP 343 - New kind of yield statement?

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 04:44 PM 5/19/2005 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
>Michael Hudson wrote:
>
> > This is, to me, neat and clear.  I don't find the idea that iterators
> > are tied to exactly 1 for loop an improvement (even though they
> > usually will be).
>
>To fix this in a fully backward-compatible way, we
>need some way of distinguishing generators that
>expect to be finalized.

No, we don't; Guido's existing proposal is quite sufficient for using 
yield.  We dont' need to create another old/new distinction here.