[Python-Dev] --disable-unicode (Tests and unicode)
mal at egenix.com
Mon Oct 3 22:52:04 CEST 2005
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
>>Is the added complexity needed to support not having Unicode support
>>compiled into Python really worth it ?
> If there are volunteers willing to maintain it, and the other volunteers
> are not affected: certainly.
No objections there. I only see that --disable-unicode
has already been broken a couple of times in the past
and no-one (except those running test suites regularly)
really noticed - at least not AFAIK.
>>I know that Martin introduced this feature a long time ago,
>>so he will have had a reason for it.
> I added it because users requested it. I personally never use it.
>>Today, I think the situation has changed: computers have more
>>memory, are faster and the need to integrate (e.g. via XML)
>>is stronger than ever - and maybe we should consider removing
>>the option to get a cleaner code base with fewer #ifdefs
>>and SyntaxErrors from the standard lib.
>>What do you think ?
> -0 for just ripping it out. +0 if PEP 5 is followed, atleast
> in spirit (i.e. give users advance warning to let them protest).
> I guess users in embedded builds (either in embedded systems,
> or embedding Python into some other application) might still
> be interested in the feature. Of course, these users could either
> recreate the feature if we remove it, or just stay with
> Python 2.4.
If embedded build users rely on it, I'd suggest that these
users take over maintenance of the patch set.
Let's add a note to the configure switch that the feature will
be removed in 2.6 and see what happens.
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Sep 30 2005)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
More information about the Python-Dev