jim at zope.com
Mon Oct 10 14:25:59 CEST 2005
Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On 10/9/05, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
>>Based on the discussion, I think I'd go with defaultproperty.
>>- Should this be in builtins, alongside property, or in
>> a library module? (Oleg suggested propertytools.)
>>- Do we need a short PEP?
> I think so. From the responses I'd say there's at most lukewarm
> interest (including from me).
Hm, I saw several responses from people who'd built something
quite similar. This suggests to me that this is a common need.
> You might also want to drop it and just
> add it to your personal (or Zope's) library.
I have something like this in Zope's library. I end up with a
very small package that isn't logically part of other packages,
but that is a dependency of lots of packages. I don't like that,
but I guess I should get over it.
I must say that I am of 2 minds about things like this. On the one
hand, I'd like Python's standard library to be small with packaging
systems to provide "extra batteries". OTOH, I often find small
tools like this that would be nice to have readily available.
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Python-Dev