[Python-Dev] PEP 3000 and exec
radeex at gmail.com
Tue Oct 11 02:31:09 CEST 2005
On 10/11/05, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote:
> My idea was to make the compiler smarter so that it would recognize
> exec() even if it was just a function.
> Another idea might be to change the exec() spec so that you are
> required to pass in a namespace (and you can't use locals() either!).
> Then the whole point becomes moot.
I think that's a great idea. It goes a step towards a more analyzable
Python, and really, I've never found a *good* use case for allowing
this invisible munging of locals. I would guess that it would simplify
the implementation, given that there are currently so many special
cases around exec, including when used with nested scopes.
Twisted | Christopher Armstrong: International Man of Twistery
Radix | -- http://radix.twistedmatrix.com
| Release Manager, Twisted Project
\\\V/// | -- http://twistedmatrix.com
|o O| |
More information about the Python-Dev