[Python-Dev] threadtools (was Re: Autoloading? (Making Queue.Queue easier to use))
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Thu Oct 13 19:08:17 CEST 2005
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005, skip at pobox.com wrote:
>
> Given your list of stuff to go in a threadtools module, I still think
> you need something to hold Lock, RLock, Condition and Semaphore. See
> my previous post (subject: Threading and synchronization primitives)
> about a threadutils module to hold these somewhat lower-level sync
> primitives. In most cases I don't think programmers need them. OTOH,
> providing some higher level abstractions seems to make sense. (I
> have to admit I have no idea what a QueueThread's outbox queue would
> be used for. Queues are generally multi-producer, single-consumer
> objects. It makes sense for a thread to have an inbox. I'm not so
> sure about an outbox.)
If you look at my thread tutorial, the spider thread pool uses a
single-producer, multiple-consumer queue to feed URLs to the retrieving
threads.
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait
until you hire an amateur." --Red Adair
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list