[Python-Dev] Definining properties - a use case for class decorators?
ronaldoussoren at mac.com
Mon Oct 24 13:13:45 CEST 2005
On 24-okt-2005, at 12:54, Josiah Carlson wrote:
> Metaclass abuse? Oh, I'm sorry, I thought that the point of
> were to offer a way to make "magic" happen in a somewhat pragmatic
> manner, you know, through metaprogramming. I would call this
> use a practical application of standard Python semantics.
I'd say using a class statement to define a property is metaclass
abuse, as would
anything that wouldn't define something class-like. The same is true
constructs, using an decorator to define something that is not a
callable would IMHO
also be abuse.
That said, I really have an opinion on the 'create' statement
proposal yet. It
does seem to have a very limited field of use. I'm quite happy with
as it is, property('get_foo', 'set_foo') would take away most if not
the remaining problems.
More information about the Python-Dev