[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Sat Sep 3 16:50:35 CEST 2005
Paolino wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> If an iterator wants to behave like that, the iterator should define
>> the appropriate __str__ method. Otherwise, just break it up into
>> multiple lines:
>>
>> write(1, 2, [3,4])
>> write(*(c for c in 'abc'))
>
> This cannot accept keyword args(I wonder if this is a bug), which makes
> it a non compatible solution with the rest of yours.
Actually, it's an ordering quirk in the parser - the extended call syntax
stuff has to come last in the function call, which means we need to put the
keyword arguments at the front:
Py> writeln(sep=', ', *(x*x for x in range(10)))
0, 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81
I personally believe keyword arguments should be allowed between *args and
**kwds at the call site, and keyword-only arguments after * in the function
definition, but the current behaviour has never bothered me enough for me to
look into what would be required to change it.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list