[Python-Dev] Replacement for print in Python 3.0
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Sun Sep 4 02:03:46 CEST 2005
Bill Janssen wrote:
> So here's the summary of the arguments against: two style points
> (trailing comma and >>stream) (from the man who approved the current
> decorator syntax!), and it's hard to extend. (By the way, I agree that
> the ">>" syntax is ugly, and IMO a bad idea in general. Shame the "@"
> wasn't used instead. :-)
> Seems pretty weak to me. Are there other args against?
Did you see Nick Coghlan's post?
I found his arguments to be reasonably compelling.
BTW, the implementation he refers to in this post is at:
and the updated version is at:
You can wordify anything if you just verb it.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
More information about the Python-Dev