[Python-Dev] Numerical robustness, IEEE etc.
nmm1 at cus.cam.ac.uk
Sat Jun 24 13:15:37 CEST 2006
"Terry Reedy" <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote:
> Of interest among their C-EPs is one for adding the equivalent of our
> decimal module
IBM is mounting a major campaign to get its general decimal arithmetic
standardised as THE standard form of arithmetic. There is a similar
(more advanced) move in C++, and they are working on Fortran. I assume
that Cobol is already on board, and there may be others.
There is nothing underhand about this - IBM is quite open about it,
I believe that they are making all critical technologies freely
design has been thought out and is at least half-sane - which makes
it among the best 1-2% of IT technologies :-(
Personally, I think that it is overkill, because it is a MASSIVELY
complex solution, and will make sense only where at least two of
implementation cost, performance, power usage and CPU/memory size are
not constraints. E.g. mainframes, heavyweight commercial codes etc.
but definitely NOT massive parallelism, very low power computing,
micro-minaturisation and so on. IEEE 754 was bad (which is why it is
so often implemented only in part), but this is MUCH worse. God alone
knows whether IBM will manage to move the whole of IT design - they
have done it before, and have failed before (often after having got
further than this).
Now, whether that makes it a good match for Python is something that
is clearly fruitful grounds for debate :-)
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Email: nmm1 at cam.ac.uk
Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679
More information about the Python-Dev