[Python-Dev] PEP 328 and PEP 338, redux
rasky at develer.com
Tue Jun 27 18:32:22 CEST 2006
Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> Actually, maybe we *do* want to, for this usage.
> Note that until Python 2.5, it was not possible to do "python -m
> nested.module", so this change merely prevents *existing* modules from
> being run this way -- when they could not have been before!
> So, such modules would require a minor change to run under -m. Is
> actually a problem, or is it a new feature?
This is where I wonder why the "def __main__()" PEP was rejected in the
first place. It would have solved this problem as well.
More information about the Python-Dev