[Python-Dev] improving quality
thomas at python.org
Tue Mar 28 18:28:46 CEST 2006
On 3/28/06, Chris AtLee <chris at atlee.ca> wrote:
> On 3/28/06, Neal Norwitz <nnorwitz at gmail.com> wrote:
> > We've made a lot of improvement with testing over the years.
> > Recently, we've gotten even more serious with the buildbot, Coverity,
> > and coverage (http://coverage.livinglogic.de). However, in order to
> > improve quality even further, we need to do a little more work. This
> > is especially important with the upcoming 2.5. Python 2.5 is the most
> > fundamental set of changes to Python since 2.2. If we're to make this
> > release work, we need to be very careful about it.
> This reminds me of something I've been wanting to ask for a while:
> does anybody run python through valgrind on a regular basis? I've
> noticed that valgrind complains a lot about invalid reads in
> PyObject_Free. I know that valgrind can warn about things that turn
> out not to be problems, but would generating a suppresion file and
> running all or part of the test suite through valgrind on the
> buildbots be useful?
See Misc/README.valgrind and Misc/valgrind-python.supp. I ran Python with
valgrind two weeks ago, and didn't encounter any new problems.
Thomas Wouters <thomas at python.org>
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev