[Python-Dev] pysqlite for 2.5?
g.brandl at gmx.net
Wed Mar 29 20:06:11 CEST 2006
Bill Janssen wrote:
>> I think short names are more more consistent with the existing naming in
>> the standard library.
> Which doesn't make it a good idea. +1 on adding longer top-level
> package names as aliases for existing shorter top-level package names.
Which existing short names do you have in mind? os? xml? email?
Let's not get excited over names here.
I say: let the RM or the BDFL, whoever feels responsible to pronounce whether
PySQLite actually gets in, decide which name it will have.
More information about the Python-Dev