[Python-Dev] Cloning threading.py using proccesses
Nick Maclaren
nmm1 at cus.cam.ac.uk
Thu Oct 12 15:25:26 CEST 2006
Josiah Carlson <jcarlson at uci.edu> wrote:
>
> It would be convenient, yes, but the question isn't always 'threads or
> processes?' In my experience (not to say that it is more or better than
> anyone else's), when going multi-process, the expense on some platforms
> is significant enough to want to persist the process (this is counter to
> my previous forking statement, but its all relative). And sometimes one
> *wants* multiple threads running in a single process handling multiple
> requests.
Yes, indeed.
This is all confused by the way that POSIX (and Microsoft) threads
have become essentially just processes with shared resources. If
one had a system with real, lightweight threads, the same might
well not be so.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren,
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
New Museums Site, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QH, England.
Email: nmm1 at cam.ac.uk
Tel.: +44 1223 334761 Fax: +44 1223 334679
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list