[Python-Dev] Grammar change in classdef
talin at acm.org
Sat Sep 16 22:32:55 CEST 2006
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> As for the reason: it makes it possible to use the same style for classes
> without bases as is used for functions without arguments. Prior to this
> change, there was a sharp break in the class syntax, such that if you got rid
> of the last base class you had to get rid of the parentheses as well.
Is the result a new-style or classic-style class? It would be nice if
using the empty parens forced a new-style class...
More information about the Python-Dev