[Python-Dev] [Python-3000] Pre-pre PEP for 'super' keyword
Tim Delaney
tcdelaney at optusnet.com.au
Mon Apr 30 13:38:30 CEST 2007
From: "Delaney, Timothy (Tim)" <tdelaney at avaya.com>
> Sorry - this is related to my proposal that the following two bits of
> code behave the same:
>
> class A(object):
> def f(self, *p, **kw):
> super.f(*p, **kw)
>
> class A(object):
> def f(self, *p, **kw):
> super(*p, **kw)
>
> But as has been pointed out, this creates an ambiguity with:
>
> class A(object):
> def f(self, *p, **kw):
> super.__call__(*p, **kw)
>
> so I want to see if I can resolve it.
A 'super' instance would be callable, without being able to access it's
__call__ method (because super.__call__ would refer to the base class method
of that name).
But I find I really don't care. The only place where that would really
matter IMO is if you want to find out if a 'super' instance is callable.
Calling a base class __call__ method would not be ambiguous - the following
two classes would work the same:
class A(object):
def __call__(self, *p, **kw):
return super.__call__(*p, **kw)
class A(object):
def __call__(self, *p, **kw):
return super(*p, **kw)
So, I guess my question is whether the most common case of calling the base
class method with the same name is worth having some further syntactic sugar
to avoid repetition? I think it is, but that would be your call Guido.
Cheers,
Tim Delaney
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list