[Python-Dev] make iter() return an empty iterator?
Kevin Jacobs <firstname.lastname@example.org>
bioinformed at gmail.com
Fri Aug 3 15:14:20 CEST 2007
On 8/3/07, Facundo Batista <facundobatista at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/8/3, Andrew Bennetts <andrew-pythondev at puzzling.org>:
> > I don't really think there's much reason to make "iter()" work. As you
> What bad thing could happen if we make iter() work? If nothing, we
> should ask ourselves: which is the more intuitive behaviour to expect
> of iter()? To raise an exception or to return an empty iterator?
> I'm +0 for the latter.
-1. I'm a heavy user of iterators on finite and infinite streams and, for
me, iter() is an error that I do not want to paper over. The alternate
logic implies, e.g., len() should return 0.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Python-Dev