[Python-Dev] Why is nb_inplace_power ternary?
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Sat Feb 10 13:42:37 CET 2007
Jim Jewett schrieb:
> Either
>
> x**= n % 10 # The **= changes the parse context, so that %
> is no longer
> # immediately evaluated
Are you seriously proposing such a change? I was asking for
spellings that currently don't have a meaning (rather, I was
suggesting that no such spelling exists, and the entire idea
of supporting such notation in the language is ridiculous).
> x**= (n, 10) # exponentiation to a tuple isn't currently
> defined, and it
Likewise: it currenly is well-defined: it invoked nb_inplace_power
with the tuple (and __ipow__ if x's class is written in Python).
Whether this gives a TypeError or not depends on the class of x.
Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list