[Python-Dev] Why is nb_inplace_power ternary?
"Martin v. Löwis"
martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Feb 14 20:02:42 CET 2007
Thomas Wouters schrieb:
>
> Sure, and I don't know if anyone will ever want ipow() -- but I've never
> seen real code use the three-argument pow() either. The fact is that all
> the in-place modifying hooks return the result (which may or may not be
> self, and may or may not be mutated) so an in-place three-argument pow()
> would have to do the same. I would prefer keeping the similarity between
> __ipow__ and __pow__, although I don't care if that means keeping the
> always-unused third argument to __ipow__ (which isn't really in the way,
> after all) or adding a new hook for the three-argument pow().
It's in the way in the sense that slot_nb_inplace_power discards its
third argument silently. That shouldn't happen, so I still prefer
removing it throughout. Would you volunteer adding to fix that?
Regards,
Martin
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list