[Python-Dev] Memory benchmarking?
M.-A. Lemburg
mal at egenix.com
Thu Nov 29 12:19:51 CET 2007
On 2007-11-29 11:52, Titus Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there a good, or standard memory benchmarking system for Python?
> pybench doesn't return significantly different results when Python 2.6
> is compiled with pymalloc and without pymalloc. Thinking on it, I'm not
> too surprised -- pybench probably benchmarks a lot of stuff -- but some
> guidance on how/whether to benchmark different memory allocation schemes
> would be welcome.
pybench focuses on runtime performance, not memory usage. It's
way of creating and deleting objects is also highly non-standard
when compared to typical use of Python in real life applications.
It's also rather difficult to benchmark memory allocation, since
most implementations work with some sort of pre-allocation,
buffer pools or free lists.
If you want to use a similar approach as pybench does, ie. benchmark
small parts of the interpreter instead of generating some grand
total, then you'd probably have to do this by spawning a separate
process per test.
> refs:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=105&colspec=ID%20Status%20Summary
>
> http://evanjones.ca/memoryallocator/
>
> http://www.advogato.org/person/wingo/diary/225.html
--
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com
Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Nov 29 2007)
>>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/
>>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________
:::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,MacOSX for free ! ::::
eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48
D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg
Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list