[Python-Dev] string representation of range in 3.0
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Thu Apr 17 16:25:34 CEST 2008
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:34 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>> Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>> That's why I proposed <0, 1, ..., 9> for repr(range(10)).
>> My worry is that this will lead a newcomer into thinking
>> this is some kind of valid expression syntax.
> You and Steven D'Aprano both.
> So if this is indeed a bad idea, I'm stumped -- the 3.0 status quo is
> the best we can do, and teachers will just have to teach their
> students to write list(range(10)) if they want to see what it means.
> Or they can write an explicit for-loop (always useful on the first
> for i in range(10):
> print i
No, they can't. ;-)
(print is a function in 3.0....)
This may seem like a minor nit -- and it is, in some ways -- but I think
reminding people of the pedagogical issues involved in the transition is
important. Granted, this is python-dev, so we should be using 2.x
syntax, but we're currently talking about 3.0 and that requires
clarifying what is meant/intended.
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
"It is easier to optimize correct code than to correct optimized code."
More information about the Python-Dev