[Python-Dev] Stable / unstable buildbots
Barry Warsaw
barry at python.org
Thu Aug 28 14:16:41 CEST 2008
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Aug 28, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> What is the rationale behind the distinction between "stable" and
> "unstable"
> buildbots?
> I ask that because the OpenBSD buildbot has failed compiling 3.0 for
> quite some
> time, but since that buildbot was in the "unstable" bunch, it was
> not discovered
> until someone filed a bug report for it (see http://bugs.python.org/issue3696)
> .
Mostly, it was a determination that Neal and I made at Pycon, about
which bots we should "trust" to judge the health of the trees. I
don't think the current list needs to be set in stone, and in fact
several of the "stable" bots have had simple svn or other non-tree
related problems for a while.
As for the "unstable" ones, I personally rarely check them.
- -Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSLaXKXEjvBPtnXfVAQJfqgQAiyoqqUNQWByKEalKmWpRyqlX56PJIzPB
S5gqubUZOvUTjVvHgvUtePPmJwEntyE+WcWXrX2tRlmMiCwantjgYOuNJeqonuwE
BVZRrIjU/mayM9gRiN9NhuGHfV/YiLKpte+DKzuYZwGW2TnaCM3ijWe2QuMxmgqZ
MMAO1w+M1kE=
=qIFo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list