[Python-Dev] A wart which should have been repaired in 3.0?

skip at pobox.com skip at pobox.com
Sat Dec 27 01:04:40 CET 2008


    skip> I just stumbled upon it again.  It seems to me this would have
    skip> been a good thing to fix in 3.0.  Is this something which could
    skip> change in 3.1 (or be deprecated in 3.1 with deletion in 3.2)?

Hmmm...  I didn't really mean "deletion".  I meant, could a behavior change
be implemented in 3.2 with a warning emitted in 3.1?

Skip


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list