[Python-Dev] A wart which should have been repaired in 3.0?
skip at pobox.com
skip at pobox.com
Sat Dec 27 01:04:40 CET 2008
skip> I just stumbled upon it again. It seems to me this would have
skip> been a good thing to fix in 3.0. Is this something which could
skip> change in 3.1 (or be deprecated in 3.1 with deletion in 3.2)?
Hmmm... I didn't really mean "deletion". I meant, could a behavior change
be implemented in 3.2 with a warning emitted in 3.1?
Skip
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list