[Python-Dev] PEP: Consolidating names in the `unittest` module
Ben Finney
ben+python at benfinney.id.au
Wed Jul 16 00:59:08 CEST 2008
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> writes:
> FWIW, I think these are fairly stated. So fairly that I'm surprised
> you haven't been persuaded!<wink>
I'm not persuaded because I find the arguments for 'fail*' more
persuasive :-)
I am, however, convinced that the consensus of the community is that
'assert*' is the right choice. The PEP will be revised accordingly.
> Nitpick: the second point is not just "precedent", there's an
> economic reason there too.
[...]
> You should mention Raymond's concern that PEP 8 names are quite a
> bit longer.
Noted both of these, thanks.
--
\ “The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a |
`\ question, but to post the wrong information.” —Aahz |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list