[Python-Dev] Unittest PEP do's and don'ts (BDFL pronouncement)
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at gmail.com
Fri Jul 18 00:41:12 CEST 2008
Tres Seaver wrote:
> Ron Adam wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>> The essence of the function remains unchanged - you're still asserting
>>> that a particular exception is raised. Returning the actual exception
>>> object that was caught is merely a convenience that makes a lot of sense.
>> I'm not sure I understand...
>
>> If "a particular exception is raised", every thing is good and there is no
>> error to report. ie... the code being tested did the right thing.
>
> I *think* that in this case the propoent wants to be able to make
> further assertions about the raised exception (e.g., to test its message).
Exactly.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.boredomandlaziness.org
More information about the Python-Dev
mailing list