[Python-Dev] Removing bsddb module from py3k (was Re: [Python-3000] No beta2 tonight)

[Jesus Cea]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Josiah Carlson wrote:
| On-disk key -> value dictionary.  In every use of bsddb that I've seen
| (or done myself), that's been the extent of it's use.  That's what I
| *was* offering.  But it seems that everyone has had experience with
| bsddb on a far deeper level (beyond dictionary + cursor access), and
| would find (like you) absolutely no use in an on-disk dictionary with
| a sqlite backend (which hasn't had the same maintenance issues as
| bsddb), which is why I withdrew the offer.

For such a simple application, you can use the already in stdlib "gdbm"
module. Just remember it is not transactional, so beware diskfulls,
application crashes, etc.

- --
Jesus Cea Avion                         _/_/      _/_/_/        _/_/_/
jcea at jcea.es - http://www.jcea.es/     _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
jabber / xmpp:jcea at jabber.org         _/_/    _/_/          _/_/_/_/_/
.                              _/_/  _/_/    _/_/          _/_/  _/_/
"Things are not so easy"      _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/    _/_/  _/_/
"My name is Dump, Core Dump"   _/_/_/        _/_/_/      _/_/  _/_/
"El amor es poner tu felicidad en la felicidad de otro" - Leibniz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQCVAwUBSIKXKJlgi5GaxT1NAQLmSQP+PEDrOy5AM6IRhIDFriyks0nTpA5a3vYi
bgrVRNJYQXTkV43AFD0bUkDFT1VBsROSlSO0jEsSfHXG2FG51TJa7Hp1LCX62ryV
H6NtztvqlA5OpTxEcWGPdha0XRueRwjYe/a+cVFXjAo+fXirlIac2W6ZhNJiAehg
VP9lxrffQSM=
=KV8P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----